A10-9620P vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.17
+1598%
A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 1598% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1802103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency63.9510.04
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 20-core GPUAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.17 1.60
Recency 30 October 2024 1 January 2017
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 14 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 1598.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or A10-9620P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.