Celeron 3215U vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 3896% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 2733 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 63.95 | 4.27 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1300 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1168 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 850 MHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 11.2/12 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.17 | 0.68 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 3895.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 3215U, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Celeron 3215U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
