Celeron 3215U vs E2-9010

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2693	2704
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	4.32	4.32
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$107

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	1.7 GHz
Bus rate	no data	5 GT/s
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	512 KB
L3 cache	no data	2 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Die size	124.5 mm2	82 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	1200 Million	1300 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)	10-15 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Virtualization,	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	FMA4	-
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
Smart Response	no data	-
FDI	no data	+
Fast Memory Access	no data	+

Security technologies

E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Identity Protection	-	+
OS Guard	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1866	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	16 GB
Max memory channels	1	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics	Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
iGPU core count	2	no data
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
Graphics max frequency	no data	850 MHz
InTru 3D	no data	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11.2/12
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	8	12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 June 2016	1 June 2015
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---