Athlon PRO 300GE vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a whopping 903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 1706 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | 63.95 | 7.29 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 30 September 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4950 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | Socket AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.17 | 2.71 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 30 September 2019 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 902.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon PRO 300GE, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon PRO 300GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
