Athlon 3000G vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.17
+863%
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 863% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1801679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesApple M4AMD Athlon
Power efficiency63.957.59
Architecture codenameno dataZen+ (2018−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)21 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2?
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 20-core GPUAMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.17 2.82
Recency 30 October 2024 21 November 2019
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 14 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 863.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2110 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.