Xeon Phi 7295 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4Intel Xeon Phi
Power efficiency29.33no data
Architecture codenameno dataKnights Mill (2017)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads16288
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data32K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.550-1.2V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSVLCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data
Max video memoryno data1 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data0 MHz

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data36

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 1 December 2017
Physical cores 16 72
Threads 16 288
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 320 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 6 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 255.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7295, on the other hand, has 350% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7295 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7295, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon Phi 7295
Xeon Phi 7295

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon Phi 7295, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.