Xeon Phi 7210 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+510%
Xeon Phi 7210
2016
64 cores / 256 threads, 215 Watt
4.60

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1651298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.332.01
Architecture codenameno dataKnights Landing (2016)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16256
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data3647
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 4.60
Recency 30 October 2024 20 June 2016
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 16 256
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 215 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 509.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 138.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7210 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon Phi 7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon Phi 7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.