Atom D2550 vs Apple M1 Pro
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Pro outperforms Atom D2550 by a whopping 4065% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M1 Pro and Atom D2550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 721 | 3154 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.46 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cedarview (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 November 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M1 Pro and Atom D2550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | 176 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M1 Pro and Atom D2550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro and Atom D2550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Pro and Atom D2550 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
| VT-i | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro and Atom D2550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of M1 Pro and Atom D2550 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 Pro and Atom D2550.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.83 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 1 November 2011 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
Apple M1 Pro has a 4065.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 400% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2550 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Atom D2550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
