Xeon Bronze 3106 vs A9-9425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.79
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.74
+109%

Xeon Bronze 3106 outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20271488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiency10.934.03
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache128K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cacheno data11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data768 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9425 1.79
Xeon Bronze 3106 3.74
+109%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9425 1513
Xeon Bronze 3106 5753
+280%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A9-9425 320
Xeon Bronze 3106 579
+80.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A9-9425 482
Xeon Bronze 3106 3151
+554%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 3.74
Recency 31 May 2016 11 July 2017
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

A9-9425 has 466.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3106, on the other hand, has a 108.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Bronze 3106 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3106 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Xeon Bronze 3106, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
Xeon Bronze 3106

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1533 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Xeon Bronze 3106, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.