Turion 64 MT-30 vs A9-9425

Place in the ranking	2031	3248
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Turion 64
Power efficiency	10.91	0.68
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L1 cache	128K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Die size	124.5 mm²	125 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	114 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FT4	754
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
PowerNow	-	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9425 1.73
+861%

Turion 64 MT-30 0.18

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A9-9425 25.83
+303%

Turion 64 MT-30 104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.73	0.18
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	25 Watt

A9-9425 has a 861.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The A9-9425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.