Xeon W-3275M vs A9-9410

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2491	197
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	4.98
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency	6.07	11.55
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads	2	56
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	4.6 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 3.0
Bus rate	no data	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	25
L1 cache	no data	1.75 MB
L2 cache	2048 KB	28 MB
L3 cache	no data	38.5 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Die size	125 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FP4	FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Virtualization,	Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	+
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	-	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size	no data	2 TB
Max memory channels	1	6
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	3	no data
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	8	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.98	25.49
Recency	31 May 2016	3 June 2019
Physical cores	2	28
Threads	2	56
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	205 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---