A6-9220e vs Xeon W-3275M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.02
+3935%
A6-9220e
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.62

Xeon W-3275M outperforms A6-9220e by a whopping 3935% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1972777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.02no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency11.559.78
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads562
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB160 KB
L2 cache28 MB1 MB
L3 cache38.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647BGA
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Virtualization,
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.02
+3935%
A6-9220e 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39736
+3967%
A6-9220e 977

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.02 0.62
Recency 3 June 2019 1 June 2017
Physical cores 28 2
Threads 56 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 3935.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9220e, on the other hand, has 3316.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while A6-9220e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 315 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.