A6-9500E vs A9-9410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.11
+15.6%

A6-9500E outperforms A9-9410 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24932398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency6.063.00
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size125 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC++
FreeSync++
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4-2400
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count34
Enduro++
Switchable graphics+-
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9410 0.96
A6-9500E 1.11
+15.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9410 1522
A6-9500E 1756
+15.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 1.11
Recency 31 May 2016 27 July 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A9-9410 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The A6-9500E is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9410 is a notebook processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 48 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.