EPYC 7513 vs A8 Pro-7150B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8 Pro-7150B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
0.96
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+3788%

EPYC 7513 outperforms A8 Pro-7150B by a whopping 3788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking250483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.23
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.7817.66
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.65 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cache4096 KB16 MB
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size245 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8 Pro-7150B 0.96
EPYC 7513 37.32
+3788%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8 Pro-7150B 1528
EPYC 7513 59285
+3780%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 37.32
Recency 4 June 2014 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 200 Watt

A8 Pro-7150B has 952.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has a 3787.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8 Pro-7150B in performance tests.

Be aware that A8 Pro-7150B is a notebook processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8 Pro-7150B and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8 Pro-7150B or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.