3020e vs A8-7680

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.22
+48%

A8-7680 outperforms 3020e by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7680 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18902207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A8AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency4.7023.81
Architecture codenameExcavator (2017−2018)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date26 October 2018 (6 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$56no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7680 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7680 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+FT5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7680 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7680 and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7680 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R7 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-7680 2.22
+48%
3020e 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7680 3568
+48%
3020e 2410

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.22 1.50
Recency 26 October 2018 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 6 Watt

A8-7680 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

3020e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Note that A8-7680 is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7680
A8-7680
AMD 3020e
3020e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 526 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 820 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-7680 and 3020e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.