A8-7680 vs A10-9700

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.23
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.24
+0.4%

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18361834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.6415.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A8
Power efficiency3.254.71
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-7680 has 334% better value for money than A10-9700.

Detailed specifications

A10-9700 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data38
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsRadeon R7 Series
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700 and A8-7680 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700 and A8-7680.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700 2.23
A8-7680 2.24
+0.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9700 3547
A8-7680 3551
+0.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 2.24
Recency 27 July 2017 26 October 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

A8-7680 has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-9700 and A8-7680.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700
A10-9700
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 415 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 517 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.