Mobile Sempron 3400+ vs A8-4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+524%
Mobile Sempron 3400+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.17

A8-4500M outperforms Mobile Sempron 3400+ by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24333280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesMobile Sempron
Power efficiency2.870.26
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Albany
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+524%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1685
+526%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 269

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A8-4500M 2438
+267%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 664

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.17
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 62 Watt

A8-4500M has a 523.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 77.1% lower power consumption.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3400+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Mobile Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Mobile Sempron 3400+
Mobile Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 317 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Mobile Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.