i7-2617M vs A8-4500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
Core i7-2617M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.06

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24152417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i7
Power efficiency2.875.90
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8.01 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7640GIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
i7-2617M 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1689
+0.1%
i7-2617M 1687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-4500M 291
i7-2617M 419
+44%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-4500M 650
i7-2617M 890
+36.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A8-4500M 1821
i7-2617M 3315
+82.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-4500M 4872
i7-2617M 6690
+37.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A8-4500M 2438
i7-2617M 2762
+13.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A8-4500M 31.45
i7-2617M 24.09
+30.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A8-4500M 2
i7-2617M 2
+23.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.19 0.66
Recency 15 May 2012 3 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

A8-4500M has 80.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

i7-2617M, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Core i7-2617M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
Intel Core i7-2617M
Core i7-2617M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 315 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2617M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Core i7-2617M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.