Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ vs A8-4500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+324%
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.25

A8-4500M outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24333166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency2.860.68
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache192 KB128K
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512K
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+324%
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1685
+323%
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 398

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.25
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1

A8-4500M has a 324% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Mobile Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 321 vote

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Mobile Athlon 64 2700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.