Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs A6-6400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6400K
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.95
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.72
+292%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms A6-6400K by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25191489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.3823.46
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache96 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8470DAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6400K 0.95
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.72
+292%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-6400K 1502
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5916
+294%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-6400K 2
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 6
+233%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A6-6400K 149
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 481
+223%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A6-6400K 88
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 126
+43.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

A6-6400K 0.83
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 1.43
+72.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 3.72
Integrated graphics card 0.97 3.04
Recency 1 June 2013 8 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has a 291.6% higher aggregate performance score, 213.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6400K in performance tests.

Note that A6-6400K is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6400K
A6-6400K
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 171 vote

Rate A6-6400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6400K or Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.