Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs A6-6310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6310
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.07
Xeon E5-2608L v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 50 Watt
4.78
+347%

Xeon E5-2608L v4 outperforms A6-6310 by a whopping 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24181268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.37
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency6.658.88
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$363

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 6.4 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data20 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2246.24 mm2
Number of transistors930 Million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT3bno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1865no data
Maximum memory sizeno data1,536 GB
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6310 1.07
Xeon E5-2608L v4 4.78
+347%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-6310 1674
Xeon E5-2608L v4 7447
+345%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 4.78
Recency 29 April 2014 20 June 2016
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

A6-6310 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2608L v4, on the other hand, has a 346.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6310 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-6310 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6310 and Xeon E5-2608L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6310
A6-6310
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v4
Xeon E5-2608L v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 235 votes

Rate A6-6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2608L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6310 or Xeon E5-2608L v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.