Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2608L v4 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 898% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2908 | 1271 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 1.39 | 8.88 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $363 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 2 × 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246.24 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1g2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 4.69 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 50 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 has 56.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2608L v4, on the other hand, has a 897.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E5-2608L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
