Atom x5-E3930 vs A6-4400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
+10.3%
Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58

A6-4400M outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27752819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.737.84
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache96 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.64
+10.3%
Atom x5-E3930 0.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-4400M 1013
+9.2%
Atom x5-E3930 928

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.58
Integrated graphics card 0.82 0.77
Recency 15 May 2012 30 August 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

A6-4400M has a 10.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 6.5% faster integrated GPU.

Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The A6-4400M is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 188 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.