Atom x5-E3930 vs A6-4400M
Aggregate performance score
A6-4400M outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2757 | 2798 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | 5x Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.72 | 8.56 |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 26 October 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 103 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FS1r2 | Intel BGA 1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown | DDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7520G | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 26 October 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
A6-4400M has a 8.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 6.5% faster integrated GPU.
Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
