Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.70
+167%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17132471
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen EmbeddedIntel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency16.4115.35
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date16 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data15 MHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.8 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes86
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 2.70
+167%
Celeron N4020 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 4135
+167%
Celeron N4020 1551

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 317
+149%
Celeron N4020 127

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 139
+88.5%
Celeron N4020 74

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1903
+128%
Celeron N4020 836

Blender(-)

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 1456
Celeron N4020 4064
+179%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 877
+89.8%
Celeron N4020 462

7-Zip Single

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 3528
+43.6%
Celeron N4020 2456

7-Zip

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 8969
+99.4%
Celeron N4020 4498

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen Embedded R1606G 148
+84.5%
Celeron N4020 80

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 1.01
Integrated graphics card 2.98 0.87
Recency 16 April 2019 4 November 2019
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1606G has a 167.3% higher aggregate performance score, 242.5% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N4020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1606G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1755 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded R1606G or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.