7 160UL vs A12-9800E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1850not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.85no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.92no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$105no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM41700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes88

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

7 160UL has an age advantage of 6 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800E and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E
Intel Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 49 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 160UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800E or Core 7 160UL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.