A12-9800E vs A10-7870K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7870K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.26

Primary details

Comparing A10-7870K and A12-9800E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18331832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.391.91
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.175.91
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date28 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$105

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A12-9800E has 390% better value for money than A10-7870K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7870K and A12-9800E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB2048 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7870K and A12-9800E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7870K and A12-9800E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC++
FreeSync++
PowerTune++
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7870K and A12-9800E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7870K and A12-9800E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4-2400
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count88
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics+-
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7870K and A12-9800E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7870K and A12-9800E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7870K and A12-9800E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7870K 2.26
A12-9800E 2.27
+0.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7870K 3465
A12-9800E 3471
+0.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-7870K 477
A12-9800E 656
+37.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-7870K 1223
A12-9800E 1512
+23.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 2.27
Recency 28 May 2015 27 July 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

A12-9800E has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A10-7870K and A12-9800E.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7870K and A12-9800E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7870K
A10-7870K
AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 70 votes

Rate A10-7870K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 49 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7870K or A12-9800E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.