Pentium D 920 vs A10-9620P
Primary details
Comparing A10-9620P and Pentium D 920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2106 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 16 January 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $241 |
Detailed specifications
A10-9620P and Pentium D 920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.2V-1.3375V |
Compatibility
Information on A10-9620P and Pentium D 920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | LGA775,PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Pentium D 920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
A10-9620P and Pentium D 920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Pentium D 920 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Pentium D 920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2017 | 16 January 2006 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
A10-9620P has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Pentium D 920. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Pentium D 920 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Pentium D 920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
