Sempron 3600+ vs A10-9620P

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2091not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.09no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Manila (2001−2006)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB256K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size250 mm2103 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million81 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9620P 2535
+596%
Sempron 3600+ 364

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 62 Watt

A10-9620P has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 313.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Sempron 3600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Sempron 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Sempron 3600+
Sempron 3600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 19 votes

Rate Sempron 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Sempron 3600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.