Celeron 3215U vs A10-7890K
Aggregate performance score
A10-7890K outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1825 | 2718 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.33 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 2.22 | 4.32 |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
Release date | 11 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1300 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2+ | FCBGA1168 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
OS Guard | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 850 MHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.2/12 |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.31 | 0.71 |
Recency | 11 January 2016 | 1 June 2015 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
A10-7890K has a 225.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron 3215U, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.
Note that A10-7890K is a desktop processor while Celeron 3215U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.