A4-6320 vs A10-5800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.86
+93.8%
A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

A10-5800K outperforms A4-6320 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800K and A4-6320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19822487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.761.40
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5800K and A4-6320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800K and A4-6320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FM2
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800K and A4-6320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and A4-6320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and A4-6320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660DAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-5800K and A4-6320 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-5800K and A4-6320 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5800K and A4-6320.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800K 1.86
+93.8%
A4-6320 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5800K 2961
+93.5%
A4-6320 1530

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 0.96
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

A10-5800K has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-6320, on the other hand, has 53.8% lower power consumption.

The A10-5800K is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and A4-6320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K
AMD A4-6320
A4-6320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 505 votes

Rate A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800K or A4-6320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.