CMP 30HX vs Xe DG1-SDV

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.35
Power efficiencyno data11.73
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG1TU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681408
Core clock speed900 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00157.1
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs4888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Length178 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 125 Watt

Xe DG1-SDV has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe DG1-SDV and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xe DG1-SDV is a desktop card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Xe DG1-SDV
Xe DG1-SDV
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 13 votes

Rate Xe DG1-SDV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.