GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Xbox Series S GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiencyno data5.01
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameLockhartGK208
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed1565 MHz1046 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate125.233.47
Floating-point processing power4.006 TFLOPS0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x8
Length274 mm145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s40.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.11x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 49 Watt

Xbox Series S GPU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 104.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox Series S GPU and GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox Series S GPU
Xbox Series S GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 866 votes

Rate Xbox Series S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.