Radeon Graphics 448SP vs Xbox One X GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameScorpioRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 November 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560448
Core clock speed1172 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors7,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate187.553.20
Floating-point processing power6.001 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs16028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth326.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2017 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One X GPU and Radeon Graphics 448SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One X GPU is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One X GPU
Xbox One X GPU
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 218 votes

Rate Xbox One X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.