Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs Xbox One X GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameScorpioMeteor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 November 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1172 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors7,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate187.543.20
Floating-point processing power6.001 TFLOPS1.382 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs16024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth326.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 28 Watt

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 435.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One X GPU and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One X GPU is a notebook card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One X GPU
Xbox One X GPU
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 217 votes

Rate Xbox One X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.