Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Xbox One S GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated865
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)no data
GPU code nameDurango 2no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)6 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed914 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate43.87no data
Floating-point processing power1.404 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1066 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One S GPU and Qualcomm Adreno 680. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 174 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.