RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs XGI Volari V3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated15
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.14
Power efficiencyno data17.07
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameXG42AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 September 2003 (21 year ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data18176
Core clock speed200 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors25 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.81,423
Floating-point processing powerno data91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs2192
TMUs4568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 19 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari V3 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari V3 is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari V3
Volari V3
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate XGI Volari V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.