TITAN RTX vs ATI WinBoost

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.11
Power efficiencyno data11.98
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMach64TU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 1995 (29 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed40 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors1 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt
Texture fill rateno data509.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed40 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 12 nm

TITAN RTX has an age advantage of 23 years, a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between WinBoost and TITAN RTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI WinBoost
WinBoost
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 813 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.