GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs ATI Video Xpression+

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated235
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Power efficiencyno data21.98
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMach64GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 1996 (28 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed62 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors1 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology600 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data67.65
Floating-point processing powerno data4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs140
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Mobile has an age advantage of 25 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Video Xpression+ is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 4489 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.