VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 vs VIA S3G UniChrome Pro
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| GPU code name | Zoetrope | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 July 2004 (20 years ago) | 1 January 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 121 MHz |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2004 | 1 January 2001 |
VIA S3G UniChrome Pro has an age advantage of 3 years.
We couldn't decide between VIA S3G UniChrome Pro and VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
