Radeon Pro 5300 vs VIA Chrome9 HC

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.14
Architectureno dataRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVN896Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores31280
Core clock speed1 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.224 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

VIA Chrome9 HC 4
Pro 5300 7143
+178475%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2007 4 August 2020

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 13 years.

We couldn't decide between VIA Chrome9 HC and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Chrome9 HC is a notebook card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 63 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.