Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics vs ATI VGA Wonder

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureWonder (1990−1992)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name18800-1Spectre SL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 February 1990 (34 years ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed10 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data655 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data17 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.396
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2047 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 KBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth40 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 February 1990 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 800 nm 28 nm

R4 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 24 years, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VGA Wonder and Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VGA Wonder is a desktop card while Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI VGA Wonder
VGA Wonder
AMD Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate VGA Wonder on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 53 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.