Radeon E9390 PCIe vs UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking600not rated
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Power efficiency38.57no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)15 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561792
Core clock speed350 MHz713 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1089 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00122.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS3.903 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs16112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 15 October 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 75 Watt

UHD Graphics has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics and Radeon E9390 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a desktop card while Radeon E9390 PCIe is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe
Radeon E9390 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5994 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9390 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.