Matrox Marvel G200 vs UHD Graphics
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 602 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 7 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 38.89 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) | G200 (1998−1999) |
| GPU code name | Jasper Lake GT1 | Eclipse |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 1998 (26 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 84 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm+ | 350 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 12.00 | 0.08 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.384 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 1 |
| TMUs | 16 | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | AGP 2x |
| Length | no data | 150 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 112 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 896.0 MB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | None |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | None |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 350 nm |
UHD Graphics has a 3400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics and Matrox Marvel G200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook card while Matrox Marvel G200 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
