Arc A550M vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.60

Arc A550M outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Arc A550M Arc A550M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616235
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Power efficiency38.3928.21
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed350 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00262.4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.60 24.69
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 60 Watt

UHD Graphics has 500% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 340.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
Arc A550M Arc A550M
vs
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
FX 3400 Quadro FX 3400
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 617
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
R3 (Mullins/Beema) Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
HD 7310 Radeon HD 7310
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
ATI HD 5770 X2 Radeon HD 5770 X2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 7234 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.