Quadro T600 Mobile vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.57

T600 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2631.62
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48896
Core clock speed350 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.96
Floating-point processing powerno data2.527 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.57
T600 Mobile 18.33
+301%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
T600 Mobile 10498
+199%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
T600 Mobile 39112
+267%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
T600 Mobile 7928
+242%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
T600 Mobile 53941
+237%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 798
T600 Mobile 2766
+247%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−183%
51
+183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−227%
35−40
+227%
Elden Ring 13
−300%
52
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−354%
55−60
+354%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−262%
75−80
+262%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−207%
40−45
+207%
Valorant 17
−335%
70−75
+335%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−354%
55−60
+354%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Dota 2 15
−673%
116
+673%
Elden Ring 10
−240%
34
+240%
Far Cry 5 22
−123%
49
+123%
Fortnite 27−30
−267%
95−100
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−347%
75−80
+347%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−530%
63
+530%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−223%
120−130
+223%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−207%
40−45
+207%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−247%
52
+247%
Valorant 12
−517%
70−75
+517%
World of Tanks 25
−780%
220−230
+780%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−354%
55−60
+354%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Dota 2 24
−346%
107
+346%
Far Cry 5 14
−221%
45
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−375%
75−80
+375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−223%
120−130
+223%
Valorant 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Elden Ring 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
World of Tanks 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−380%
45−50
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Elden Ring 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Metro Exodus 0−1 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Fortnite 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Valorant 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Elden Ring 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (77%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 18.33
Recency 15 August 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 40 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 301.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 480 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.