GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 1423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 646 | 1319 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.77 |
Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | no data |
GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | MCP79MX |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 11 May 2021 (3 years ago) | 14 October 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 16 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 282 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 12 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 10.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 18
+1700%
| 1−2
−1700%
|
1440p | 25
+2400%
| 1−2
−2400%
|
4K | 12 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 11 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Hitman 3 | 10
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
Metro Exodus | 22
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 15 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 47
+67.9%
|
27−30
−67.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Hitman 3 | 9
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
Metro Exodus | 16
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 17
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 43
+53.6%
|
27−30
−53.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and 9400M (G) / ION (LE) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1700% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 2400% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 450% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is 13% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
- 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is ahead in 1 test (3%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.72 | 0.31 |
Recency | 11 May 2021 | 14 October 2008 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 1422.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.