GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72
+1423%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 1423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6461319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.77
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)no data
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeMCP79MX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)14 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed350 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data282 Million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72
+1423%
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.31

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+2148%
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
1440p25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
4K120−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+400%
2−3
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Hitman 3 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 22
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+67.9%
27−30
−67.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Hitman 3 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and 9400M (G) / ION (LE) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1700% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 2400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 450% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 0.31
Recency 11 May 2021 14 October 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 1422.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.