GeForce 7600 GS vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with GeForce 7600 GS, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.74
+1056%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms 7600 GS by a whopping 1056% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6571265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.04
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeG73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)22 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$84.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data27 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
1440p25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
4K12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data84.99
1440pno data42.50
4Kno data84.99

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Fortnite 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Valorant 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+1200%
6−7
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Far Cry 5 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Fortnite 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 11 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Valorant 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Battlefield 5 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Far Cry 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Fortnite 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Valorant 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 9−10 0−1
Atomic Heart 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and 7600 GS compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1700% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1150% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.74 0.41
Recency 11 May 2021 22 March 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 1056.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7600 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while GeForce 7600 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
GeForce 7600 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8
106 votes

Rate GeForce 7600 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or GeForce 7600 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.