FirePro W6150M vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with FirePro W6150M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72

W6150M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking639576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeSaturn
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 November 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed350 MHz1075 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data51.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.651 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data88 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
1440p28
−25%
35−40
+25%
4K12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
−20%
12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Hitman 3 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Metro Exodus 22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Hitman 3 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Metro Exodus 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and W6150M compete in popular games:

  • W6150M is 24% faster in 1080p
  • W6150M is 25% faster in 1440p
  • W6150M is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 6.11
Recency 11 May 2021 12 November 2015
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

W6150M, on the other hand, has a 29.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro W6150M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
AMD FirePro W6150M
FirePro W6150M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.