Arc A530M vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
2.30

Arc A530M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking853306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.77
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeDG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161536
Core clock speed350 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data124.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.994 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−627%
80−85
+627%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−80%
9−10
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 627% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 250% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A530M is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • Arc A530M is ahead in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.30 17.74
Recency 30 March 2021 1 August 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm

Arc A530M has a 671.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 361 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 195 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.