Quadro Plex 2100 D4 vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.50no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2G92
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192128
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8032.00
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2020 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 640 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 4166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics P630 and Quadro Plex 2100 D4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Quadro Plex 2100 D4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Quadro Plex 2100 D4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 D4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.